AT&T’s conflicting stance on net neutrality continues with call for Internet Bill of Rights

1516865436 atts conflicting stance on net neutrality continues with call for internet bill of rights

  • AT&T printed an open letter that known as for an “Internet Bill of Rights.”
  • AT&T additionally strengthened it does no longer bog down community efficiency primarily based on content material.
  • The open letter is observed as hypocritical, seeing how the provider has fought net neutrality legislation for years.

When I opened The Washington Post app on my pill, it gave the impression peculiar to peer AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson calling for net neutrality regulations in an open letter. It’s no longer that net neutrality is one thing we must forget about, however as a result of AT&T says something and does any other.

In the open letter, Stephenson desires an “Internet Bill of Rights” that might implement “neutrality, transparency, openness, non-discrimination and privacy protection” for American web customers. This invoice would additionally identify “consistent rules of the road” that offer web carrier suppliers and telecom corporations some expectancies.

Stephenson additionally strengthened that AT&T is “committed to an open internet” and does no longer “throttle, discriminate, or degrade network performance based on content.”

This sounds all smartly and excellent, however AT&T has fought net neutrality legislation for years. The provider spent over $16 million in lobbying in 2017 on my own and mentioned the FCC’s vote to repeal net neutrality regulations wasn’t a large deal.

The open letter additionally mentioned not anything about paid prioritization and speedy lanes. Paid prioritization is when ISPs price corporations like Google to prioritize their content material over others.

AT&T and others attempted to undertake this style with FaceTime, Netflix, and extra. Even such things as T-Mobile’s Binge On and AT&T’s Sponsored Data are thought to be examples of paid prioritization.

In different phrases, AT&T’s open letter turns out extra like smoke and mirrors than one thing official. You can not speak about net neutrality with out speaking about paid prioritization, and the provider’s silence on the latter is deafening.

We reached out to the Electronic Frontier Foundation for remark on AT&T’s open letter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *